With the announcement made by Steve Jobs and the rest of the Apple crew it seems that the entire web was hyped or anti-hyped about the device. Of course it wasn't a surprise anymore that it would be a tablet. But the price and features make it a worthy opponent to the current Netbook market.

Starting at $499 for the 16 GB WiFi version up to $829 for the 32 GB WiFi+3G version, Apple wants to pretty much cover anyone. Whether teen, tween, or any other generation, the device may apply to you. For each their own, and such is the iPad, a general purpose device that Apple hopes to fill the gap between iPhone (smartphone) and Mac (notebook).

Looking at the device imminently reminds you of an iPhone or iPod touch XL, but the heavily customized iPhone OS, say iPad OS, in conjunction with the release of iWorks and iBooks makes it a new experience. Simply put, you might actually be able to use the iPad to write long e-mails, extensive browsing and reading eBooks. However being an almost a future device from either Mass Effect or Star Trek there is so much more potential. My guess is that the iPad will certainly sell well, but besides our simple needs as consumers it will also extend itself as a tool for medical care.

Imagine a doctor next to your bed reading your status chart (which shows a lot more info than a sheet), and updating it on the fly, administered in the medical care cloud. Before you know it everything will be dealt with and hopefully you can be treated, or going home soon with much less hassle. Or in the education you could see school kids not dragging heavy bags, but just an iPad with their school books in eBook (ePub) format. And of course their assignments are typed in, papers are send per e-mail and history lessons with text, video and interactive elements will never be the same.

The way we consider computers will never be the same. Let's face it. We are the technical people, sometimes referred to as nerds or geeks, or just enthusiasts. Let's not put labels on groups of people though. But what I'm getting at is that a large portion of people does not want to be bother by the computer, but wants to use it. A closed environment like the iPad is exactly what they want. No hassle, just go surf, read e-mail, or play a game. No weird errors, no difficult installs or uninstalls, no viruses, no other web browser but Safari.

Wait, hmm let me explain. I love Safari, I especially adore its engine WebKit, a love apparently shared by Google as well, hence the inclusion in Chrome. And with such a cutting edge web browser being even more widespread available, we as web standards supports cannot but be happy. But I believe that a free product, such as Safari, should be allowed to have competition on the App Store. Currently players like Opera, Mozilla and Google cannot participate because it duplicates function as a competitive product. Of course Apple does not want direct competition of it's iTunes, App Store or iBooks Library. After all that's where the money truly is. But a web browser with richer or innovative features is not something you should block.

Hopefully Apple will reconsider some App Store restrictions as they have with VoIP. As the iPad with WiFi+3G has no "phone" application (nor SMS), VoIP is a valuable alternative to have voice conversations. Similarly having the option of other web browsers on App Store should enrich the user experience.

Anyway, I'll definitely buy it. I really believe this is the device we've been waiting for to accompany the computer (PC or Mac). Over the years we'll see much heavier interaction between our computer and tablet. If you were working on a paper and want to continue re-reading what you've written you just drag it out of your screen to your tabled, and walk away with your coffee and tablet to sit outside. The Apple A4 SoC is already very powerful but new CPU/GPU evolutions is certainly taking place there with giant leaps. And once the LCD is replaced by some kind of Pixel Qi inspired technology (with superb colors, and refresh rate) you'll by all means have forgotten why this was even discussed at all. As long as Apple keeps the device open for alternatives, I have no problem seeing them as one of the major players.